Braids and the Configuration Space of Points

One can view a n string braid as a loop in the configuration space of n points in the plane. I made a quickie screencast to illustrate this.

Braid

Actually I was trying to see if I could get SketchUp to animate the moving points seen in the first half of the screencast. In the end I did it manually with the assistance of section planes. The second half however is done automatically. Get the model and click on the beginsweep/endsweep buttons after opening it in SketchUp.

About these ads

~ by Ken Baker on June 30, 2008.

3 Responses to “Braids and the Configuration Space of Points”

  1. Hi! I programmed an attractive online calculator that find the greatest common divisor(GCD) between two numbers. I will be happy, if you add the link in your blog. I hope that you and your visitors will enjoy!

    http://gcd.awardspace.com


    bye!

  2. I had a question regarding the configuration space of n particle systems.
    One of the defining properties of braids require that no two strings pass through the same point. If instead it is allowed, then the strings would practically be independent of each other. Because almost all interesting braids will be homotopically equivalent. So if I understand correctly, there won’t be anything non trivial if we let the strings pass/cut through each other

    Now from the physics point of view, time evolution of an n-particle quantum system in the configuration manifold corresponds to a braid of n strings. But the reason that this is a correct model for n-particle system is that we do not let points of the form ( x_1,x_1,x_2….x_(n-1) ), where two or more coordinates are the same, be in the configuration space of n particles.
    I find it hard to justify this requirement on the configuration space of n particles. Leinaas and Myrheim, in the paper ‘On the theory of identical particles’ justifies this elimination of repeated coordinates (they call such points singular, I don’t know why) by saying that they have measure 0 (I think I can see that but this convenience does not justify the assumption).

    Do you know if their is any real physical motivation to remove those points from the config space?

    • An instance of repeated coordinates means you’re at a time where you’ve got (at least) two particles in the same position. Assuming two different things don’t occupy the same space, I reckon it’s reasonable to not include such points in the config space. Points at which a space fails to be locally a manifold (like where two strands of a ‘braid’ actually meet) are often called singular.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 152 other followers

%d bloggers like this: